Open source insecurity
 | ||
 | Email weblog link | |
 | Discuss | |
 | Blog this |
Andy Oram
Jul. 26, 2005 05:01 AM
Permalink
He [Doug Fisher] wrapped up his presentation to the usual polite applause and closed his slide show to reveal the message "Windows XP has locked your desktop," resulting in the single loudest and most sustained booing by nearly everyone present I have ever heard, followed by a member of the audience rushing to the front brandishing a Linux installation CD to widespread applause.
I was present for this incident, and vouch that the noise and emotion released was extraordinary. Wow! I felt like I was in the middle of a scene from some Hollywood epic where the soldiers raise their spears and roar their defiance to the enemy.
Graham makes a subtle but valuable comment on the incident while describing the next speaker:
So why was this audience of 800 hard-core Linux developers and adopters so intolerant of a speaker who uses a Window platform? What is the deep well from which such emotion comes?His laptop, in contrast to Fisher's, ran Linux, but perhaps demonstrated why Fisher's didn't. After a lengthy battle with X to have an appropriate resolution for the overhead projector, he launched his presentation entitled "How to talk to business people about the value of open source," which sparked the comment of an audience member sitting near me: "not like this."
They have legitimate anger, of course, at Microsoft's illegal anticompetitive behavior, which has been well established in several courts, and the company's continuing hounding of Linux by pressuring governments, funding SCO, and spreading biased reports. The attendees also have the same kind of familiar team spirit that breaks out (sometimes quite violently) when different sports fans come together.
But that does not add up, in my view, to the display of anger I saw that evening. Another ingredient needs to be added: insecurity.
Linux developers and users are aware that what they put together is not yet convenient to install or easy to use. They resent Windows not only because it has a dominating position, but because that position is maintained by something more organic than the vaguaries of computing history or corporate behavior. Microsoft (on the desktop, in particular) awaits an open source challenge, and that challenge is not yet strong enough.
I have prepared some fairly detailed slide presentations, trying out Microsoft's PowerPoint, OpenOffice.org's Presenter, and KDE's KPresenter for that purpose. Presentation suites are either very hard to develop or are the perennially neglected stepchildren of the office suite, because I found all three products embarrassingly buggy. PowerPoint bears the most shame because it's been around the longest and Microsoft promotes it as a professional tool worth a lot of money.
Still, if Doug Fisher has spent a career developing presentations with PowerPoint, why is it a sin for him to use it for one more presentation? It would certainly have been a smart move to feel out the mood of his audience beforehand and to take the time to set up Linux and a free software office suite. But if the Linux and open source crowd felt more secure in the superiority of their product, his gaffe would have been greeted with just a few snorts and giggles.
I see too much of this moralistic hypersensitivity among people whose goals I respect. Environmentalists are telling us to replace our light bulbs, take public transportation, and recycle everything we can--yes, all wonderful goals. But some environmentalists also realize that individual behavior change cannot be achieved on a mass scale through moralizing; new technologies and institutional strategies must drive progress.
The same goes for personal life choices, which contribute to the health care crisis. It would be great for everybody to cut down on tobacco, trans fats, chemical household products, and epic Hollywood movies, but lecturing does little to help.
You can apply this principle even to nationalistic and religiously close-minded political stances. These are tearing the world apart, but we can't get anywhere by telling people just to throw away their commitments to these beliefs and to embrace a neutral, diverse world. Those attempting change have to realize that people have reasons for holding on to their stances.
Getting back to open source: the way forward is to build something so great it compels everyone to use it, and to move institutions (ironically, the topic of the second presentation that evening at Ottawa Linux Symposium) to positions where they can make the switch.
The really great aspect of the Ottawa Linux Symposium is that its attitude overall is in diametric opposition to the defensiveness displayed toward the Windows-wielding presenter. The Linux developers and their communities could easily waste time wallowing in excuses such as "Vendors don't give us their specs" or "Implementations don't conform to standards." But they don't do this. They say, "What can we do to make this work?" And that's the path to success.
Andy Oram is an editor for O'Reilly Media, specializing in Linux and free software books, and a member of Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility. His web site is www.praxagora.com/andyo.
Showing messages 1 through 6 of 6.
-
Linux as a religion
2005-07-27 00:05:22 jwenting [Reply | View]
The fervour of the crowd you witnessed is a clear sign of religious zeal.
To that crowd Linux is god and Linus his prophet.
They consider themselves the priests of Linux and his Holy Army, their mission to stamp out all evil by spreading the Faith through whatever means possible (preferably by defeating that evil in a sea of blood).
No wonder then that they behave similarly to a crowd of Palestinians after a mullah calls for the destruction of all infidels. Replace Linux CDs with bomb belts and shouts of "Microsoft is evil" with "Allah Akhbar" and there is no difference between these groups (except that one wears Tux T-shirts and the other wraps towels around their heads).
-
"Linux Zealots"
2005-07-26 20:16:42 mark miller [Reply | View]
Lets turn it around. If a team member from that other OS were to be found out when she used Linux for a Windows presentation do you think tshe would get the can? If you are going to advocate for Linux or desire to work in that space you damn sure better use the products you are touting. I have a job working in the Linux community and you can bet I use Linux for everything including presentations.
When you don't have a lot of money you must have fervent supporters!
-
Nah...
2005-07-26 17:03:47 jeffpc [Reply | View]
I was there too, and yes, I did boo as well. But I didn't do that because I _hate_ Windows, but because it was fun to point out the obvious.
1) He's presenting about using Linux
2) He's presenting at a Linux conference
3) He's presenting using Windows
I wouldn't be surprised if other people presented with Windows, but they hid it well. His only mistake was to leave the projector plugged in after the presentation.
Yes there are people out there that passionately hate Windows, but let's not forget that there are intelligent people that know that Windows is better than Linux in some aspects. Over the few days at the conference I met a _lot_ of very intelligent people and many of them agree with me. I guess what I am trying to say is: use the right tool for the right job.
Jeff.
-
I like the sports analogy
2005-07-26 09:42:13 bairdcarr1 [Reply | View]
I am often annoyed by people standing out in the hall at work arguing about their favorite sports teams, the players, coaches, etc. As if "My Team" is at all affected by my enthusiasm or how loud I shout at the TV.
I think from now on, I will refer to myself as a "Linux Fan" (short for fanatic, I believe, but apparently it's better than zealot. At least I'm not a Linux fundamentalist, whatever that is...) instead of a "Linux Zealot", although I may still call myself a "Penguin Lover". I'm not going to take down the large format color print of Tux someone made for me on the color plotter.
Unlike sports fans, I have a very real affect on the outcome of the game. I'm a member of the team, and I carry the ball in the form of LiveCDs and various distro Install CDs.
I set up Linux servers at work, at clients offices, and at home. I continually encourage them to improve their uptimes... "C'mon, let's make it 540 days this time!!!". I restart services, tweak config files, perform automated backups, and write new and interesting shell scripts.
Ok, I'm finished...
| Showing messages 1 through 6 of 6. |
Return to weblogs.oreilly.com.
Weblog authors are solely responsible for the content and accuracy of their weblogs, including opinions they express, and O'Reilly Media, Inc., disclaims any and all liabililty for that content, its accuracy, and opinions it may contain.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License.
At least 1/5 of the audience was standing around drinking instead of paying attention to the presentation itself.
Once the Windows display was visisble however and a few had booed or heckled, the rest joined in -- its mob behaviour. There's no real logic to it, although I like your excuses.